United Way of King CountyUnited Way of King County Community Assessment - King County review of health and human services

Best and Promising Practices


The Best and Promising Practices Inventory is a list of service models, curricula and other social service practices that are the most likely to be effective based on available research. 

Purpose

The goal of this project is to have readily accessible information for maximizing our community impact by promoting effective services. Our impact councils will use this information in planning the best way to have an impact on community conditions. It will also be a resource for grantees to inform their contributions to that impact.

What is included?

Best and Promising Practices Index
The current list of practices includes descriptions of several service models or practices addressing the outcomes prioritized by each of our impact councils. We will continue to expand the inventory over time to include additional practices as new research is completed. We will also add practices related to additional outcomes that contribute to our community impact work.

Support for Choosing and Implementing Evidence Based Practices
Evidence based practices must be carefully selected and implemented in order to create real improvements for program participants. A body of research on how to prepare for, select and implement evidence based practices successfully is becoming available. 

Support for Improving Existing Programs
Many service strategies are based on sound theory, are well managed and may very well be highly effective, but haven't been rigorously evaluated. Adequate research is not available to determine the best strategies for achieving some outcomes. There are however, some "best practices" that can improve the likelihood that a service strategy will be effective. 

How did United Way select practices for the inventory?

Practices were selected based on agreement in the field as to their effectiveness. We determined the level of agreement by reviewing the work of national research and technical assistance organizations that have compiled lists of “best practices”.

In some impact areas and for some outcomes, this agreement is based on a large body of research.  In other areas, less research or less rigorous research has been accomplished.

In some areas a large number of “proven practices” is available. We selected those that are most appropriate for our impact work.  We included only the practices with the best research on a specific outcome, unless it is clear that additional, less-tested models are recommended for specific populations or are otherwise of particular interest to our local efforts.

How are practices categorized?

There are a number of models for categorizing evidence-based practice. We found the term “best practice” to be confusing, because it is so commonly used in many different ways. We consulted with researchers who have done the analysis of research to establish other evidence-based practice compendia, developed and tested several alternatives before settling on the categories below.

Typology of Practices

Proven

Promising

Field Suggested

Have been shown in controlled studies to produce significantly better results than were achieved by control groups toward a desired outcome
 AND
The intervention has been replicated one or more times and an additional controlled study has shown similar results.

Have been shown in one controlled study to produce significantly better results than were achieved by a control group toward a desired outcome
OR
There is a strong theoretical support or less rigorous research indicating that they will lead to desired outcomes and a controlled study is underway.

There is a strong theoretical support or less rigorous research indicating that they will lead to desired outcomes
AND
A national professional  technical assistance organization or other recognized authority on the issue recommends the practice.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Resources

Promising Practices Network on Children, Families and Communities: www.promisingpractices.net.

Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA).National Registry of Evidence-based

Programs and Practices (NREPP): www.nrepp.samhsa.gov

National Council on Aging, Center for Healthy Aging, Model Programs: www.healthyagingprograms.com

Center for the Study and Prevention of Violence Blueprints: www.colorado.edu/cspv/blueprints

What Works Clearing House (education): http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/